When is a partial fraction irreducible

Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Asked 4 years, 8 months ago. Active 4 years, 5 months ago. Viewed 2k times.

ADA 1, 8 8 silver badges 20 20 bronze badges. The Pointer The Pointer 3, 9 9 gold badges 46 46 silver badges bronze badges.

Consider you can only have two summands since you only have two factors. What does that mean for the numerators? If you have any linear algebra, you would call this system inconsistent, since of the impossibility to get singular values. You have three equations and only 2 unknowns. That sets up issues So you need a third unknown, but with only two fractions, it must be in the numerator of one of the two.

But if your third unknown is only a constant, two constants added yield one. So the third unknown must be the coefficient of a higher degree. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Pretend the denominator is factorisable Finally, we can pretend the denominator is actually factorisable, and see what happens when we put the fractions back together.

Chappers Chappers Upcoming Events. In the above example, one of the coefficients turned out to be zero. This doesn't happen often in algebra classes, anyway , but don't be surprised if you get zero, or even fractions, for some of your coefficients. The textbooks usually stick pretty closely to nice neat whole numbers, but not always. Don't just assume that a fraction or a zero is a wrong answer.

For instance:. Note: You can also handle the fractions like this:. If the denominator of your rational expression has an unfactorable quadratic , then you have to account for the possible "size" of the numerator. If the denominator contains a degree-two factor, then the numerator might not be just a number; it might be of degree one.

So you would deal with a quadratic factor in the denominator by including a linear expression in the numerator. I can't factor the quadratic bit, so my expanded form will look like this:. Multiplying through by the common denominator, I get:. Since I have no other helpful x -values to work with, I think I'll take the one value I've solved for, equate the remaining coefficients, and see what that gives me:. There is no one "right" way to solve for the values of the coefficients.

Use whichever method "feels" right to you on a given exercise. Stapel, Elizabeth. Accessed [Date] [Month] The "Homework Guidelines".